Verdict: Evidence needed: an audited cost-per-outcome methodology backing the donor tiers. Evidence located: none; substantiation request unanswered.
“Save 1 Life — $500 / Save 2 Lives — $1,000 / Save 5 Lives — $2,500 / Save 10 Lives — $5,000 / Save 20 Lives — $10,000 / Save 50 Lives — $25,000” — Donation interface, marici.org/donate/ & Millie Giving ('$500 — One life saved') [source] [archived]
Screen capture: marici.org/donate/, captured 16 May 2026. Reproduced under fair use for criticism and reporting.
Why this matters
This is not aspirational fundraising language. It is a specific dollar-to-outcome ratio presented at the point of donation. It implies that an individual donor’s $500 contribution will result in one identifiable life saved.
Under California charitable solicitation law and IRS Publication 1771 guidance, specific impact representations to donors should be substantiable.
What we asked
- How is “Save 1 Life” defined?
- Is $500 based on audited cost-per-outcome data?
- Who verifies these outcomes?
- Are donors informed the figure may be a projection rather than a guaranteed outcome?
No response.